首页> 外文OA文献 >The Neecham Confusion Scale and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale: capacity to discriminate and ease of use in clinical practice
【2h】

The Neecham Confusion Scale and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale: capacity to discriminate and ease of use in clinical practice

机译:Neecham混淆量表和Deli妄观察筛查量表:在临床实践中能够区分和易于使用的能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a frequent form of psychopathology in elderly hospitalized patients; it is a symptom of acute somatic illness. The consequences of delirium include high morbidity and mortality, lengthened hospital stay, and nursing home placement. Early recognition of delirium symptoms enables the underlying cause to be diagnosed and treated and can prevent negative outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine which of the two delirium observation screening scales, the NEECHAM Confusion Scale or the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, has the best discriminative capacity for diagnosing delirium and which is more practical for daily use by nurses. METHODS: The project was conducted on four wards of a university hospital; 87 patients were included. During 3 shifts, these patients were observed for symptoms of delirium, which were rated on both scales. A DSM-IV diagnosis of delirium was made or rejected by a geriatrician. Nurses were asked to rate the practical value of both scales using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The sensitivity (0.89-1.00) and specificity (0.86-0.88) of the DOS and the NEECHAM were high for both scales. Nurses rated the practical use of the DOS scale as significantly easier than the NEECHAM. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of standardized observation depends largely on the consent of professionals and their acceptance of a scale. In our hospital, we therefore chose to involve nurses in the choice between two instruments. During the study they were able to experience both scales and give their opinion on ease of use. In the final decision on the instrument we found that both scales were very acceptable in terms of sensitivity and specificity, so the opinion of the nurses was decisive. They were positive about both instruments; however, they rated the DOS scale as significantly easier to use and relevant to their practice. Our findings were obtained from a single site study with a small sample, so a large comparative trial to study the value of both scales further is recommended. On the basis of our experience during this study and findings from the literature with regard to the implementation of delirium guidelines, we will monitor the further implementation of the DOS Scale in our hospital with intensive consultation
机译:背景:Deli妄是老年住院患者的一种常见的精神病理学形式。这是急性躯体疾病的症状。 ir妄的后果包括高发病率和高死亡率,延长住院时间和安置疗养院。 del妄症状的早期识别可以诊断和治疗潜在原因,并可以防止不良后果。这项研究的目的是确定两种del妄观察筛查量表,NEECHAM混淆量表或the妄观察筛查量表(DOS)量表中,哪一种对del妄的诊断能力最强,并且对于护士的日常使用更为实用。方法:该项目在大学医院的四个病房中进行;包括87例患者。在3个班次中,观察了这些患者的ir妄症状,并用两种量表进行了评分。 DSM-IV诊断为ir妄是由老年科医生做出或拒绝的。要求护士使用结构化问卷对两种量表的实用价值进行评分。结果:DOS和NEECHAM的敏感性(0.89-1.00)和特异性(0.86-0.88)在两个量表上均较高。护士认为DOS秤的实际使用要比NEECHAM容易得多。结论:标准化观察的成功实施很大程度上取决于专业人员的同意及其对量表的接受程度。因此,在我们医院,我们选择让护士参与两种器械的选择。在研究过程中,他们能够体验到两种量表并就易用性发表意见。在仪器的最终决定中,我们发现,无论从敏感性还是特异性上来说,两种量表都是可以接受的,因此护士的意见具有决定性。他们对这两种工具都持肯定态度。但是,他们认为DOS秤非常易于使用并且与他们的实践相关。我们的研究结果是从单地点研究中以少量样本获得的,因此建议进行大型比较试验以进一步研究两种量表的价值。根据我们在研究过程中的经验以及有关ir妄指南实施的文献发现,我们将在深入咨询下监测我院DOS量表的进一步实施情况

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号